Appropriating Native American Imagery Honor Research Paper

 

A Rhetorical Analysis of “Appropriating Native American Imagery Honor No One but the Prejudice” by Amy Stretten

Amy Stretten presents a compelling argument on the impacts that Native American imagery has on American citizens, but more specifically to the Native Americans that live abroad. Stretten’s presentation of the imagery of Native Americans as sports mascots is with personal discomfort, and readers get the notion that they should take advocacy against such imageries. Specifically, the author dwells on the offensive of the sports mascots’ imagery, the rituals related to mascots, and the lack of willingness of the American public to change their perception of the Native Americans.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

 

The majority of Amy Stretten’s argument is constructed on pathos appeal as she vividly describes her experiences with the Native American mascot while at high school. The author enhances the appeal by using narration from Ian Campeau, a Native American whose daughter has a red skin as a mascot. The father struggles with the fact that his daughter would be called a redskin. The sensitive idea of suicide that the author introduces expresses the displeasure of the youth when referred to as rednecks, and also serves to impact sadness among the youths. The author uses a picture of a Native American man who is disappointed to see the Caucasian man whose face is painted with fake headdresses. By so doing, she communicates why there is a need to eradicate mascots. These devices help the author draw an emotional link with the readers in support of her course of the argument. Appropriating Native American Imagery Honor Research Paper

Stretten’s work has limited logos within its content, but the author applies facts acquired from credible sources to support her claim and enhance her central point of view. She quotes the Center for Disease Prevention and Control on statistics about bullying among Native Americans. She also acquires relevant statistics to advance her claim that offensive sports mascots are more harmful than beneficial. Additionally, she borrows from Charlene Teters’ accounts of how “Chief Illiniwek,” which was the great mascot from the University of Illinois, was stopped.

The credibility of her sources is ascertained when she attaches an online link to these sources in case readers wish to pursue further information. Being part of the community that uses mascots and having witnessed its effects increase the authenticity of the article. The author narrates mainly her experiences and disregards the other side of the story, which makes the argument well thought out and adequately persuasive. Even readers who were previously pleased by the Native Americans would eventually alter their thoughts about these artifacts.Appropriating Native American Imagery Honor Research Paper

× How can I help you?